Reta intelek

Reta intelek (RI) iya nya kategori reta ti nyengkaum asil ti enda ulih dipeda ari intelek mensia.^[1] Mayuh macham bansa reta intelek, lalu sekeda menua ngelala lebih ari menua bukai.^[2] Jenis ti pemadu dikelala iya nya paten, hak gaga, chap dagang, enggau resia dagang. Konsep moden reta intelek tu mansang di England dalam abad ke-17 enggau ke-18. Leka jaku "reta intelek" berengkah dikena dalam abad ke-19, taja pan ukai nyentuk ngagai ujung abad ke-20 reta intelektual nyadi utai ti suah dikena ba tebal agi sistem undang-undang dunya.^[3]

Kereban sanding

↑ World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2016). Understanding Industrial Property. World Intellectual Property Organization. doi:10.34667/tind.36288. ISBN 9789280525939. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
↑ World Intellectual Property Organization (2021). What is Intellectual Property?. WIPO publication. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). doi:10.34667/tind.43765. ISBN 9789280532210. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
↑ "property as a common descriptor of the field probably traces to the foundation of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) by the United Nations." in Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding Archived 26 Februari 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Texas Law Review, 2005, Vol. 83:1031, page 1033, footnote 4.

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2016). Understanding Industrial Property. World Intellectual Property Organization. doi:10.34667/tind.36288. ISBN 9789280525939. Retrieved 6 December 2018.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (2021). What is Intellectual Property?. WIPO publication. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). doi:10.34667/tind.43765. ISBN 9789280532210. Retrieved 23 October 2020.

[Lemley_2005-3] "property as a common descriptor of the field probably traces to the foundation of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) by the United Nations." in Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding Archived 26 Februari 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Texas Law Review, 2005, Vol. 83:1031, page 1033, footnote 4.

[1]

[2]

[3]